Global sustainable fishing initiative agreed by 14 countries

Original Article: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/02/global-sustainable-fishing-initiative-agreed-by-14-countries

By: Fiona Harvey Environment correspondent

Governments responsible for 40% of the world’s coastlines have pledged to end overfishing, restore dwindling fish populations and stop the flow of plastic pollution into the seas in the next 10 years.

The leaders of the 14 countries set out a series of commitments on Wednesday that mark the world’s biggest ocean sustainability initiative, in the absence of a fully fledged UN treaty on marine life.

The countries – Australia, Canada, Chile, Fiji, Ghana, Indonesia, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, Namibia, Norway, Palau and Portugal – will end harmful subsidies that contribute to overfishing, a key demand of campaigners. They will also aim to eliminate illegal fishing through better enforcement and management, and to minimise bycatch and discards, as well as implementing national fisheries plans based on scientific advice.

Each of the countries, members of the High Level Panel for Sustainable Ocean Economy, has also pledged to ensure that all the areas of ocean within its own national jurisdiction – known as exclusive economic zones – are managed sustainably by 2025. That amounts to an area of ocean roughly the size of Africa.

Erna Solberg, the prime minister of Norway, said: “Humanity’s wellbeing is deeply intertwined with the health of the ocean. It sustains us, stabilises the climate and leads to greater prosperity. For too long, we have perceived a false choice between ocean protection and production. No longer. We understand the opportunities of action and the risks of inaction, and we know the solutions. Building a sustainable ocean economy is one of the greatest opportunities of our time.”

Scott Morrison, the prime minister of Australia, said: “Australians have always had a deep connection to the ocean. It is an integral part of who we are: our culture, lives and livelihoods … When I speak to children in schools in Australia, pollution destroying our oceans is what they talk to me about. Along with the Ocean Panel Leaders, we are committing to sustainably manage 100% of our ocean areas by 2025 and we encourage other world leaders to join us.”

Research has found that if oceans were sustainably managed, they could provide six times more food than today, when many species are fished up to and beyond their recovery limits. Economists also calculate that for every $1 invested in sustainable oceans, there is about $5 return in economic, social, environmental and health benefits, and that sustainably managing the world’s oceans would create about 12m new jobs.

Jane Lubchenco, the administrator of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under President Obama, told the Guardian the initiative was “a really big deal” and could restore the health of the world’s oceans, as well as benefiting the global economy and societies.

“What you have now is a hodgepodge [of ocean management], sector by sector, it’s not holistic. That does nothing to help recover the health of the underlying ecosystems, and we are seeing a loss of biodiversity, climate change running rampant – business as usual would just continue the decline of the oceans,” she said. “The oceans are in a very sorry state right now.”

Oceans panel presses coastal states to invest in 'blue recovery'

Read more

With the more coordinated response envisaged by the High Level Panel, there was a chance that the destruction could be halted, she said. “We are beginning to understand that the ocean is really central to all our lives.”

The 14 world leaders want other countries to join the panel, to create a global sustainable ocean plan that they said could also have a major influence on the climate. One fifth of the reductions in emissions needed to meet the Paris agreement goal, of holding global heating to no more than 1.5C above pre-industrial levels, could come from the oceans, according to the panel, by improving the ability of the oceans to absorb carbon and by investing in technologies such as offshore wind.

Solberg said: “If we manage oceans sustainably it will be good for all our people. To have secure jobs, you will have to work with other countries.”

Their commitments also include: a global target to protect 30% of the world’s oceans by 2030, alongside setting out national plans by 2025 that would ensure local sustainability; to use technology to improve the monitoring of fishing; to eliminate the discarding of “ghost” fishing gear; to invest in sewage and waste management infrastructure in developing countries; to place national targets on decarbonising shipping transport; and to scale up environmentally responsible forms of fish farming.

Some of the work of restoring health to the oceans must also take place on land. In a report, the leaders set out the case for shifting to a “circular economy that would prevent plastic pollution from reaching the sea, and improving agricultural regulation on land to halt the spread of “dead zones” from fertiliser and manure runoff.

Henrik Österblom, the science director at the Stockholm Resilience Centre, said: “[This initiative] shows that politicians are listening to the science. Now they need to act. The ocean is not too big to fail. If we do not change course, key biophysical functions in the oceans could collapse. Yet just 2.6% of the ocean has the high level of protection it needs.”

The report found that more than 3 billion people rely on food from the oceans each day, and a healthy ocean contributes $1.5tn to the global economy, as well as absorbing a quarter of carbon dioxide emissions and producing half the world’s oxygen.

A spokesperson for the UK government said: “The UK is at the forefront of the global fight to protect our marine habitats, and is championing a global commitment to protect at least 30% of the global ocean by 2030. We will carefully consider the recommendations made by the High Level Panel, to ensure we continue to work globally to raise the bar for marine protection.”

Robert Anthony Clark receives Order of Canada for work with sustainable seafood

The BCTFA would like to congratulate the newest recipients of the Order of Canada awarded by Governor General Julie Payette, 17 of whom are from British Columbia

A special congratulations to Robert Anthony Clark (Vancouver): "For establishing a world-renowned program to help businesses and customers identify and purchase sustainable seafood." The chef, author and co-owner of the Fish Counter is a founding partner of the Vancouver Aquarium's Ocean Wise program.

Link to article: https://www.vancouverisawesome.com/bc-news/17-british-columbians-appointed-to-the-order-of-canada-3132224

Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant Program DEADLINE EXTENDED OCTOBER 19 2020

Thank you to the PHMA and BC Seafood Alliance for the following summary:

THE DEADLINE FOR THE FISH HARVESTER BENEFIT AND GRANT PROGRAMS HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO OCTOBER 19, 2020 – SEE EMAIL BELOW FROM DFO.  IF YOU INTEND TO APPLY FOR ONE OF THESE PROGRAMS, APPLY NOW!!   DO NOT WAIT TO THE DEADLINE.

 

THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW:

 

  • If you run into problems with your application, you must make sure you have a file number from Service Canada’s help line as issues can likely be fixed after the Monday deadline if you have a Service Canada file number.  The government help line can be reached at 1.833.674.8283.

 

  • How to resolve some of the most common problems with the harvester grant and benefit where they appear to qualify and then get kicked out by the system:

 

Scenario

A harvester applies corporately.  In that case, it is the corporation’s FIN that must go on the form, not the individual’s.  Some harvesters do not realize there is a corporate FIN.  In this case, call DFO licencing to get your corporate FIN.

 

Scenario

If a harvester who is a shareholder (multiple people on one licence) applies and self-identifies as a harvester and not a shareperson, he/she is taking the wrong path in the application. The system may tell them that they have qualified for the benefit and the grant, but their FIN will not be accepted since it is not the sole FIN connected to the application.  The application cannot be submitted and the applicant will need to go back and correctly self-identify as a shareperson. This should send them on the right path and let them complete and submit the application correctly.

 

  • One of the complications is confusion over what other programs applicants may have applied for which could render them ineligible.  Important to understand whether you have applied for CEWS, CEBA or CERB because the implications are different.  Applicants have been disqualified because they were confused on this.  It is very difficult to correct an application so people need to get it right the first time.

 

 

  • The helpline, 1.833.674.8283, should help with more difficult issues.  The earlier in the day you can call the better; otherwise you will be on hold for hours and it may take a day or two to get answers.  Write down in advance of talking to the hotline exactly what the problem is so you can explain clearly, especially if you are mixing personal and corporate claims.

 

  • Third parties (accountant, family member) can apply on your behalf if they have access to the required information.

 

Deadline approaching for the Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant Program SEPTEMBER 21, 2020

REMINDER

Fish Harvester Benefit and Grant Program is open for applications (August 24, 2020, through to September 21, 2020. Please apply as early as you can!

 *If you have applied for or received Canadian Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) then you are not eligible for the Benefit.  If you have applied for or received the Canadian Emergency Business Account (CEBA) or equivalent measures you are not eligible for the Grant.*

Fish Harvester Benefit

The Fish Harvester Benefit offers income support to self-employed fish harvesters and sharepersons. The benefit covers up to 75% of income losses beyond a 25% threshold for the 2020 tax year when compared to 2018 or 2019. The maximum benefit is $10,164.

 

Who is eligible?

The following are eligible for the Fish Harvester Benefit:

·         Self-employed commercial fish harvesters (e.g. “owner-operators”, enterprise heads, inshore, licence holders, or hold limited entry commercial licence eligibility (Pacific))

·         Self-employed freshwater fish harvesters

·         Indigenous harvesters who are designated by their community under a communal commercial fishing licence

·         Sharepersons crew

 

Who is not eligible?

The following are not eligible for the Fish Harvester Benefit:

·         Commercial fish harvesters in the offshore sector

·         Recreational fish harvesters, including sport fishing enterprises

·         Individuals and companies within the aquaculture sector

·         Individuals and companies within the processing sector

·         Wage-earning crew

·         Anyone who has applied for or received Canadian Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS)

 

What information will I need to provide?

Individuals applying for the Fish Harvester Grant need to ensure that they have the following information available:

·         Social Insurance Number (SIN)

·         Full Name

·         Amount of their reported self-employed fishing income for the 2018 or 2019 tax year

·         Income Tax Program Account Number if income is reported under a corporation

·         Projected estimate of the applicant’s self-employed fishing income for 2020

·         Applicant’s full home address

·         Phone number

·         Email

·         Bank details for payments (including branch transit number, institution number and account number)

Fish Harvester Grant

The Fish Harvester Grant is a non-repayable grant to self-employed fish harvesters with a valid commercial fishing licence in 2020 (issued by DFO or their Province or Territory for freshwater commercial harvesters).  The Grant provides a maximum non-repayable support of up to $10,000, dependent on the level of the fish harvesters’ historic fishing revenue in 2018 or 2019.  A lesser Grant amount may be provided on a sliding scale relative to revenue or actual expenses, with payments under the Grant not to exceed actual expenses.

 

Who is eligible?

The following are eligible for the Fish Harvester Grant:

·         Self-employed commercial fish harvesters (e.g. “owner-operators”, enterprise heads, inshore licence holders or hold limited entry commercial licence eligibility (Pacific)

·         Freshwater fish harvesters (subject to provincial agreement to provide licensing information)

·         Indigenous harvesters who are designated as Vessel Masters by their community under a communal commercial fishing licence

 

Additional criteria for the Fish Harvester Grant:

·         Must hold a valid commercial fishing license for 2020

·         Must have landings against a commercial fishing license for 2018 or 2019

 

Who is not eligible?

The following are not eligible for the Fish Harvester Grant:

·         Crew (wage-earning and share persons)

·         Commercial fish harvesters in the offshore sector

·         Recreational fish harvesters, including sport fishing enterprises

·         Individuals and companies within the aquaculture sector

·         Individuals and companies within the processing sector

·         Anyone who has applied for or received the Canadian Emergency Business Account (CEBA) or equivalent measures

 

What information will I need to provide?

Individuals applying for the Fish Harvester Benefit need to ensure that they have the following information available:

·         Social Insurance Number (SIN)

·         Full Name

·         The amount of their reported self-employed fishing income for the 2018 or 2019 tax years

·         Income Tax Program Account Number if income is reported under a corporation

·         Projected estimate of the applicant’s self-employed fishing income for 2020

·         Applicant’s full home address

·         Phone number

·         Email

·         Bank details for payments (including branch transit number, institution number and account number)

·         Unique Identifier or Fisher Identification Number (FIN)

Scout Canning launches new BC caught Albacore Tuna line

Scout canning, an Canadian seafood canning company has launched its new BC caught Albacore tuna line.

Scout is working with BC tuna fishermen and local canneries.

More about Scout:

Scout works directly with North American fisheries and sustainable farms from coast to coast. Our fishery partners meet the highest standard in sustainability, including reduced by-catch and minimal ecosystem impact. We source from responsible fisheries that support their communities. Fishermen, producers and processors are paid fair wages and receive benefits. Our farmed products are fed from natural sources and have never been exposed to antibiotics, hormones or overcrowding in their pens.

Scout’s mission is to be the most trusted seafood brand in North America while reducing food waste and protecting our oceans and waterways.

Reducing Food Waste:

50% of fresh and frozen seafood ends up in landfills, a major issue we need to change. By preserving seafood through the canning we extend the shelf life of our products, reducing food waste. You enjoy delicious seafood with 100% of the nutritional benefits without any additives or preservatives.

Lower Carbon Footprint:

The carbon footprint of canned seafood is substantially less compared to the energy requirements needed in the supply chain of chilled and frozen seafood.

To view the new video featuring harvester Justin Dickens, executive director Tiare Boyes and MSC Commercial and Fisheries Manager of Canada West, Kurtis Hayne speaking about the BC Albacore Tuna fishery click on the link below:

https://youtu.be/xEhSnMy0pv0

Minister Jordan addresses the Organisation for the Economic Co-operation and Development on the need for a more sustainable blue economy

“OTTAWA, ON, Sept. 8, 2020 /CNW/ - Canada is an ocean nation. Canadians rely on healthy, marine ecosystems to sustain our economy, our food supply, and our coastal communities. But the ocean is a shared resource that requires global cooperation to protect and manage.

Today, the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, the Honourable Bernadette Jordan, addressed the need for a more sustainable, blue economy at a launch event for the report: Sustainable Ocean for All – Harnessing the benefits of sustainable ocean economies for developing countries organized by the Organisation for the Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

During the virtual event, Minister Jordan discussed how the global pandemic has underscored our vulnerabilities, but also how it offers a chance to create a more resilient and sustainable ocean economy. To this end, the Government of Canada is developing a comprehensive Blue Economy Strategy that will outline Canada's vision for ocean-related sectors and help guide future actions and investments.

Minister Jordan outlined the Government of Canada's ongoing work to protect our oceans, pointing to their surpassing of the marine conservation targets to protect 10 percent of our oceans by the end of 2020, reaching nearly 14% in 2019. She emphasized the importance of international partnerships on ocean protections and spoke to ways in which Canada has and will continue to work with its global partners to this end. 

The Minister highlighted Canada's recent action joining the United Kingdom's Global Ocean Alliance, advocating for the adoption of a global target of 30 per cent marine conservation by 2030 at the Convention on Biological Diversity COP 15 in China next year. 

Minister Jordan made it clear that Canada will continue to build on Canada's 2018 G7 Presidency priority on oceans. Canada will advance the Ocean Plastics Charter, which encourages ambitious international action and cooperation by governments, businesses and organizations to address marine plastic pollution, and implementing the Charlevoix Blueprint on Healthy Oceans, Seas, and Resilient Coastal Communities.

The Minister praised the OECD report and noted how developing countries can utilize its findings and recommendations to create more sustainable, ocean industries. The report is part of the Sustainable Ocean for All initiative launched in 2019 to support developing countries harness the benefits of a sustainable ocean economy.”

Loss of Lives at Sea

With heavy hearts we mourn the loss of two of our own who lost their lives at sea this month.

The BCTFA wishes to express our most sincere and heartfelt condolences to the loved ones of those who lost their lives at sea, August 11th 2020.

Tom Lindberg was known to many in the BC fishing industry and many in the BC Tuna fleet.

Tom was a founding director and past President of the BCTFA. He was also a founding director of the CHMSF as well as a member of Tuna Advisory Board (TAB) representing  USA/CDN Fishermen.

His contributions to our industry and his legacy will not be forgotten.

At this time the BCTFA does not know the identity of the second crew member but wishes to express our grief for this tragic loss of life and to send condolences to their loved ones who have been left behind.

For those of us who make our living on the sea this is a tragedy that unites us all in grief.

-Office of the BCTFA

Majority of Seafood by Weight Consumed at Home (US data, pre-pandemic)

Source: https://sustainablefisheries-uw.org/seafood-consumption-statistics/

By Max Mossler

Other news sources: https://www.seafoodnews.com/Story/1176277/The-Winding-Glass-Retail-Seafood-Increase-Likely-Permanent-Provides-Opportunity-to-Rethink-Retail

“A notion (myth?) I often encounter when covering seafood and the science behind it, is that people generally don’t eat fish at home. The prevailing market research suggests home cooks lack confidence to prepare seafood in their own kitchens so it’s thought that most, or the majority, or 70% of seafood is consumed in restaurants. Two months ago, after searching for the most accurate statistic (I found several), I wrote on this site that “over half of all seafood is eaten at restaurants.”

However, Love et al, a new paper out in June 2020, reveals that I was wrong. Using one of the most comprehensive surveys of U.S. diet from 2007-2016, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, researchers finally have accurate numbers on seafood consumption in the United States (pre-pandemic). They found that by weight, 63% of seafood is consumed at home, with the majority coming from retail and a smaller proportion from takeout. That statistic doesn’t show the whole picture, however. Like most things in fisheries, reality is nuanced: In this post, I break down the statistics researchers report to paint a clearer picture of seafood consumption in the U.S. before and after the coronavirus pandemic.

Seafood consumption statistics in the U.S.

The exact numbers are this: 56% of seafood is purchased at a retail outlet like a grocery store or fish market, while 31% is purchased at restaurants (the remaining percentages are personally caught, gifted, or unknown).

The U.S. seafood market is worth $102 billion. In total expenditures, 65% of dollars are spent at restaurants or away from home sources while 35% spent on seafood at home. The average American spends 48% their food budget away from home, so the percentage of money spent on seafood at restaurants is much higher than other foodstuffs. How does this impact the price that fishermen and women get for their catch? We spoke to scientists, industry sources, and restaurant owners about the relationship between the price of a menu item and the price a restaurant pays for fish. From our conversations, a reasonable estimate is that roughly 20-30% of a restaurant menu price is the price paid by the restaurant for the seafood. If you pay $100 for a crab leg dinner, the restaurant probably pays $20-30 for the crab legs they serve you. What this means in a broader context is that, though more money is spent at restaurants overall, fish mongers get about the same price whether selling to restaurants or retail.

However, the retail vs restaurant market is extremely different on the species level. For example, researchers estimate that over half of all crab, catfish, cod, and shrimp is eaten at a restaurant while tuna and salmon are more likely to be eaten at home.

How has the pandemic changed things?

With the coronavirus pandemic closing or limiting restaurants, fishermen and women supplying them are hurting, however, the pain is not felt equally across the industry. Fisheries that catch species more often found in restaurants are struggling, while species that consumers are comfortable cooking at home are doing better. Seafood was the fastest growing supermarket category during the last week of May and supermarket sales have continued to surge through July.

Supply chain shakeups have been a challenge, however. Switching to retail markets after selling to restaurants is not a quick or easy process. Larger seafood companies with established relationships have advantages over smaller companies and independent boats. Many are trying to sell their catch directly to consumers to make up for losses. We developed a map of these seafood businesses so you can support local fishermen and women.

Looming on the horizon is a prolonged recession. Seafood is a relatively expensive protein so an economic downturn will deepen the industry’s pain.

Other consumption notes

Seafood consumption is higher on the coasts, though refrigeration technology continues to improve access for inland areas.

Americans’ weekly consumption of seafood has stayed around 5oz per week for the past 30 years, less than the recommended 8oz per week. Researchers estimate that only 10% to 20% of U.S. consumers meet the federal Dietary Guideline.

Analyses of trade data indicate that the five top species consumed by Americans are shrimp, salmon, canned tuna, catfish/pangasius, and tilapia, which jointly comprise 70–80% of the U.S. seafood supply. Focus has shifted from wild capture to farm-raised products, and there is an increasing reliance on imports as U.S. production has been stable since the mid-1980′s…Consumers note preferences to purchase familiar types of seafood, which limits the demand for diverse fish types.

The statistics from Love et al. 2020 are an important baseline to establish. Future consumption trends and impacts of the pandemic will have something to be measured against.

A myth or not?

Though my previous claim that the majority of seafood is eaten at restaurants is false, the outsized role that restaurants play in the seafood industry—especially to small-scale American fishers—is clear.

The pandemic is still impacting the industry: In addition to livelihood risk, the close quarters of fishing boats and processing plants put seafood workers at increased health risk, though so far the seafood industry has mostly avoided outbreaks and the tragedies plaguing the farming and meat packing industry.   

I strongly encourage you to support sustainable seafood during the pandemic. Buy seafood next time you shop for food or use our map to find a business to order directly from. Cooking seafood at home is easier than ever.”